Team, Visitors, External Collaborators
Overall Objectives
Research Program
Application Domains
Highlights of the Year
New Software and Platforms
New Results
Bilateral Contracts and Grants with Industry
Partnerships and Cooperations
Dissemination
Bibliography
XML PDF e-pub
PDF e-Pub


Section: New Results

Routing Problems

In [7] we deal with the Minimum Latency Problem (MLP), another variant of the well-known Traveling Salesman Problem in which the objective is to minimize the sum of waiting times of customers. This problem arises in many applications where customer satisfaction is more important than the total time spent by the server. This paper presents a novel branch-and-price algorithm for MLP that strongly relies on new features for the ng-path relaxation, namely: (1) a new labeling algorithm with an enhanced dominance rule named multiple partial label dominance; (2) a generalized definition of ng-sets in terms of arcs, instead of nodes; and (3) a strategy for decreasing ng-set sizes when those sets are being dynamically chosen. Also, other elements of efficient exact algorithms for vehicle routing problems are incorporated into our method, such as reduced cost fixing, dual stabilization, route enumeration and strong branching. Computational experiments over TSPLIB instances are reported, showing that several instances not solved by the current state-of-the-art method can now be solved.

We also considered a family of Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) variants that generalize the classical Capacitated VRP by taking into account the possibility that vehicles differ by capacity, costs, depot allocation, or even by the subset of customers that they can visit. In [5] we propose a branch-cut-and-price algorithm that adapts advanced features found in the best performing exact algorithms for homogeneous fleet VRPs. The original contributions include: (i) the use of Extended Capacity Cuts, defined over a pseudo-polynomially large extended formulation, together with Rank-1 Cuts, defined over the Set Partitioning Formulation; (ii) the concept of vehicle-type dependent memory for Rank-1 Cuts; and (iii) a new family of lifted Extended Capacity Cuts that takes advantage of the vehicle-type dependent route enumeration. The algorithm was extensively tested in instances of the literature and was shown to be significantly better than previous exact algorithms, finding optimal solutions for many instances with up to 200 customers and also for some larger instances. Several new best solutions were found too.

We examined the robust counterpart of the classical Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) in [13], [20]. We considered two types of uncertainty sets for the customer demands: the classical budget polytope introduced by Bertsimas and Sim (2003), and a partitioned budget polytope proposed by Gounaris et al. (2013). We showed that using the set-partitioning formulation it is possible to reformulate our problem as a deterministic heterogeneous vehicle routing problem. Thus, many state-of-the-art techniques for exactly solving deterministic VRPs can be applied for the robust counterpart, and a modern branch-and-cut-and-price algorithm can be adapted to our setting by keeping the number of pricing subproblems strictly polynomial. More importantly, we introduced new techniques to significantly improve the efficiency of the algorithm. We present analytical conditions under which a pricing subproblem is infeasible. This result is general and can be applied to other combinatorial optimization problems with knapsack uncertainty. We also introduced robust capacity cuts which are provably stronger than the ones known in the literature. Finally, a fast iterated local search algorithm was proposed to obtain heuristic solutions for the problem. Using our branch-and-cut-and-price algorithm incorporating existing and new techniques, we were able to solve to optimality all but one open instances from the literature.

In [14], we have generalized our Branch-Cut-and-Price algorithm to solve other Vehicle Routing and related combinatorial optimization problems, as Generalized Assignment, Bin Packing, and Vector Packing. Our generic approach outperformed several problem specific algorithms.